Recall your small group’s discussion last week and the outline you completed in week 2. Briefly, share your small group’s evaluation of Elizabeth Kim’s ethical duties. Now consider Elizabeth Kim’s emotional response to her dilemma. Which principles of care or virtue theory would Elizabeth Kim use to arrive at a caring response? How do these principles work with the principles of duty discussed in your small groups?
in each discussion forum, the object is to increase understanding of many different ethical views. Keep in mind the Principle of Charity. We have a responsibility to be open to new ideas about ethics here, just as you each have a responsibility to be open to your patients’ views. This openness includes the new theories introduced each week and the participants’ views expressed in the forum. Seek to understand a view or concept before criticizing it. If your understanding is incomplete, ask respectful questions targeted at the ideas, and not the person expressing them. Answer questions honestly and with respect. We also have a responsibility to express our own views in such a way that invites discussion. Avoid stereotypes and labelling groups or people, discussing ideas respectfully without use of irrelevant information about the arguer. Avoidance of the ad hominem fallacy is crucial to ethical discussion. This does not mean that disagreement is off limits! Disagreements are best made with support and respectful discourse and questioning