Doctoral Project Proposal Checklist School Level Review
Doctoral Project Proposal Checklist School Level Review
School of Nursing and Health Sciences
Instructions
Please use the DPP School Level Review Checklist to ensure mentees have met the requirements within each section of the DPP form. This checklist is a guide to help the mentor and the mentee.
1. It is an expectation that the mentee will review the checklist and initial all items completed prior to sending to mentor, found at: https://campus.capella.edu/web/doctoral-programs/professional//capstone or
https://campus.capella.edu/web/school-of-nursing-and-health-sciences/doctoral-capstone
2. Mentor review of the DPP checklist:
a. The mentor will review each section of the DPP checklist confirming the outlined requirements have been met.
b. If met, the mentor will place their initials in the met box for that section.
c. If not met, the mentor will place their initials in the not met box and provide feedback under “Reviewer’s Comments” in the sections not met.
3. Committee review of the DPP checklist:
a. Once the mentor has approved the DPP form and completed a review of the checklist, the mentor will send the initialed DPP checklist and the DPP form to the mentee’s committee for review.
Each committee member will
a. If met, place their initials in the met box for that section.
b. If not met, place their initials in the not met box and provide feedback under “Reviewer’s Comments” in the sections not met.
c. The committee member will send the checklist back to the mentor to provide to the mentee.
4. School level review- Once ready for school level review, the mentor will:
a. Remove all comments on the DPP checklist that have been corrected
b. Leave the reviewer’s initials approving the DPP form as met.
c. Send the DPP checklist with the approved DPP form to school level review.
5. School level review will use the DPP checklist to confirm that each section has been met. If not approved the reviewers will provide feedback on how to meet the requirements on the DPP checklist under “Reviewer comments” within each section.
Learner__________________________________ Mentor ___________________________________________
Committee Members _______________________________________________________________________________
School level review performed by and date:
Version 1 __________________________________________________________
Version 2 __________________________________________________________
Version 3 __________________________________________________________
Version 3 co-reviewer ________________________________________________
Version 4 __________________________________________________________
Learner__________________________________ Mentor ___________________________________________
Committee Members _______________________________________________________________________________
Section | Requirements: DPP Part 2 | Met | Not Met/ Comments |
Introduction | · Identify the focus of the project and the significance (includes at least 1-2 background studies).
· Provides the project goals and the relationship to the PICOT question. Reviewer’s comments to learner: 1. |
||
Review of Literature | · Articles reviewed with a minimum of 20 required, all published within the last five years, unless a seminal article.
· Describes extensive review of the literature (including keywords, search phrases, databases used, number of articles found, inclusion/exclusion criteria, number of articles retained and why). · Provides information on the significance of the problem, such as the following: incidence and/or prevalence, national data and quality/regulatory expectations, impact on patient, family, and healthcare system, financial implications, cultural, healthcare policy, quality, safety, legal, ethical implications if pertinent. · Thorough review and critical analysis of literature. · Synthesis of evidence supporting the question and project. This is not an annotated bibliography. · Provides completed evidence table. Reviewer’s comments to learner: 1. |
||
Framework | · Describes theoretical framework or conceptual model.
· Connects study goals and PICOT to framework or model. · Defines study variables. · Describes any study assumptions. Reviewer’s comments to learner: 1. |
||
Method | · Describes project design, setting, population and sampling.
· Describes human subject’s protection methods (as applicable). · Identifies outcome measures. · Describes implementation plans including thorough description of implementation process; psychometric properties (reliability and validity) of any instruments used; status of permission to use instruments; procedures for data collection. · If the instrument is not public, permission to use the instrument is attached as an appendix. · Describes project evaluation including type of data analysis. · Discusses the anticipated findings. · Discusses the study limitations: · Factors that might limit internal validity. What efforts will be taken to minimize and or adjust for the limitations? Reviewer’s comments to learner: 1. |
||
Sampling | · Discusses the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Reviewer’s comments to learner: 1. |
||
Meet program-specific requirements for proposal/research plan approval. | · Completes evidence table, includes all references in DPP.
· Complete reference list for DPP. Reviewer’s comments to learner: 1. |
||
Write with logic, flow, etc. | |||
Write with proper grammar, usage, APA etc. | |||
Date of learner revision(s) | |||
Date of preceptor revision(s) request/approval | |||
Date of committee revision(s) request/approval |
School level review performed by and date:
Version 1 __________________________________________________________
Version 2 __________________________________________________________
Version 3 __________________________________________________________
Version 3 co-reviewer ________________________________________________
Version 4 __________________________________________________________
December 7, 2017